Last updated: 08:00 PM ET, Fri June 05 2015

The Good, The Bad, and The Affordable: Ranking US Summer Destinations

Destination & Tourism | Patrick Clarke | June 05, 2015

The Good, The Bad, and The Affordable: Ranking US Summer Destinations

If you're looking to leave home for summer vacation but don't want to break the bank, consider Sin City.

Not only does the Las Vegas metropolitan area boast an array of world-class attractions, it won't cost you a fortune to get there. 

WalletHub, a social network geared toward personal finance, set out to determine the "most fun-filled and wallet-friendly" U.S. destinations for travelers this summer by examining more than a dozen metrics, including the cost and hassles of getting to a destination, in addition to the anticipated expenses upon arrival. 

Keep in mind that WalletHub only examined the 80 most populated metropolitan areas in the U.S. 

Here's a breakdown of the top 10 based on WalletHub's research:

1. Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, Nevada

2. Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, Florida

3. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Georgia

4. Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, Arizona

5. Salt Lake City, Utah

6. Austin-Round Rock, Texas

7. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

8. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas

9. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, California

10. Albuquerque, New Mexico

Las Vegas was propelled to the top spot by its plethora of attractions. The destination ranked first in that category, beating out West Coast metropolises like San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles. 

Second-place Orlando ranked better than Las Vegas in transportation costs, local costs and parks and recreation, but lost out in terms of attractions and weather conditions. 

Like Orlando, Atlanta's abundance of parks and recreations helped carry it into the top five. 

While Phoenix and Salt Lake City ranked toward the middle of the pack in terms of parks and recreations, cheap local costs (Phoenix ranked seventh) and excellent weather conditions (Salt Lake City ranked sixth) lifted them up in the overall rankings.

Top-ranked Texas destinations Austin and Dallas benefited from cheap transportation costs (fifth and fourth respectively) and affordable local costs. 

Meanwhile, nearby Oklahoma City ranked second in local costs, pushing it into the top 10. 

Despite hefty local costs, Los Angeles' top 10-ranked attractions and weather conditions helped lift it to the top of the list. 

On the flip side, here's how the bottom 10 destinations shook out: 

71. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Pennsylvania-New Jersey

72. North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, Florida

73. Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Connecticut

74. Albany-Schenectady-Troy, New York

75. Rochester, New York

76. Worcester, Massachusetts-Connecticut

77. Syracuse, New York

78. Providence-Warwick, Rhode Island-Massachusetts

79. New Haven-Milford, Connecticut

80. Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Connecticut

The Northeast dominates the bottom-ranked destinations, with New York and New England showing up frequently.

As you would expect, all 10 destinations fared poorly across the five categories, with only two ranking better than 40th in at least one category. 

Click here for a complete breakdown of all 80 destinations courtesy of WalletHub.

For more information on United States

For more Destination & Tourism News


You may use your Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook information, including your name, photo & any other personal data you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on Click here to learn more.

Xcaret: Experience All of Mexico in One Place

Hotels & Resorts