Tourists to Help Pay for Beleaguered Honolulu Rail

If your travel plans took you to Honolulu for Labor Day weekend, you might have witnessed the first-ever test of the rail cars that will transit people about the city once the Honolulu Rail Transit Project is complete.

The 20-mile, $9.5 billion transit line, which will be fully automated—or, driverless—is expected to begin operating in late 2020.

The Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), which manages the rail line, touts the project’s benefits as a “fast, safe, reliable alternative to driving in traffic congestion. In addition, there will be about 40,000 fewer car trips on Oahu's congested streets and freeways.”

But the rail line is not without controversy.

MORE Car Rental & Rail

Chrissy Taylor Named Chief Executive Officer of...

Boca Raton City Council Approves Brightline/Virgin Trains...

Uber Safety Report Reveals Over 3000 Sexual Assaults Last...

Originally estimated to cost taxpayers $4.6 billion, rail line estimates skyrocketed to $6.7 billion by early 2016, according to the New York Times. To cover the difference, the city then voted to extend a half percent General Excise Tax (GET) surcharge by five years.

At the time, Panos D. Prevedouros, a civil engineering professor at the University of Hawaii remarked of the price tag, “it’s very dear for a small place like us, with only 400,000 taxpayers.”

Just 18 months later, cost estimates have ballooned again and now hover in the neighborhood of $9.5 billion, according to the Associated Press (h/t U.S. News.) The half-finished rail, now one of the most expensive per capita in the nation, was facing a new shortfall of $2.4 billion.

Adding to the pressure, the Federal Transportation Administration, which has committed $1.5 billion toward the project, gave HART a firm September 15 deadline to prove it could pay for the project or the federal government would pull its funding.

Late last week, the Hawaii Legislature approved a plan to increase funding. They would extend the GET surcharge for another three years which would contribute an additional $1 billion toward the project.

The rest of the shortfall will be made up by visitors to Hawaii. The bill includes a statewide increase of the transient accommodations tax (TAT) by one percent for three years, which should serve to raise the necessary $1.3 billion.

Some lawmakers and members of the tourism industry across the state have issued harsh criticism for being expected to help foot the bill on a local rail line.

Among the most vocal opponents, Mike White, the Council Chairman for Maui County, has said the tax will hurt local businesses in his region. Essentially, said White, visitors are on a fixed budget. The extra one percent in hotel taxes will mean they spend less on dining, entertainment and attractions in the communities they visit.

“One percent increase in TAT would remove over $30 million from our Neighbor Island communities and economies, sending it to Oahu,” said White in a statement on his website.

White also noted that Kauai, Maui and Hawaii counties contribute $247 million to the state’s total TAT revenues, accounting for 51 percent. Oahu, on the other hand, accounts for $237 million, or 49 percent of the hotel tax revenues.

READ MORE: Hawaii Renames Honolulu Airport to Honor Late US Senator

According to the Hawaii Tribune Herald, that amount contributed by neighboring island communities could actually be higher. The article cites Outrigger Enterprises Group as an example. While Outrigger has six properties on Maui and four on the Big Island in addition to its seven on Oahu, all of its TAT revenue is recorded as coming through the head office located on Oahu.

Other opponents also voiced the concern that the TAT is a fluid revenue source based on the whims and trends of inbound visitor markets.

Mufi Hannemann, once the mayor of Honolulu and now the head of the Hawaii Lodging & Tourism Association, cited a concern that the volatile nature of the hotel bed tax could still result in a shortfall towards the project. He recommended finding a more “stable funding source.”

Proponents of the bill argue that 80 percent of Hawaii’s population lives on Oahu and their taxes are often used to fund projects in other regions.

The bill passed Hawaii's Senate last week with a 9-6 vote and passed the House with a 31-15 vote. It will now head to the desk of Governor David Ige, who is expected to sign it into law within a few days.

Follow @MonicaPoling